Latest TweetsVerify any search engine or visitor via CLI Forward-Reverse Lookup perishablepress.com/cli-forwar…
Perishable Press

FeedBurner Subscriber Count Problems

[ FeedBurper ] I checked my Feedburner subscriber count on April 2nd and was surprised to see that the number of RSS subscribers had dropped from around 1800 to around 1100. The next day, my subscriber count decreased again, this time to around 700. Today, my Feedburner statistics increased slightly to around 1000 subscribers. So, in the course of three days I lost around 40% of my loyal readers, according to Google Feedburner. Will I get these subscribers back? Will my Google subscriber count return to normal? Why did my Feedburner count drop in the first place? Let’s explore the issue and try to answer these critical questions.

Not an Isolated Incident

Feedburner chokes way too often. Many of you will remember that this sudden drop in subscriber counts also happened several months ago when Google began transferring everyone’s Feedburner accounts to new or existing Google accounts. In the process of migrating everyone’s feeds from the “feeds.feedburner.com” subdomain to the inventively named “feeds2.feedburner.com” subdomain, many sites experienced severe drops in their Feedburner subscriber counts. According to Google:

In addition, the algorithms we use to calculate subscribers and reach at Google are more accurate and up to date than the algorithms previously used at FeedBurner.com, so your numbers will not be exactly the same before and after the transfer. We are constantly tuning our analytics to ensure they are accurate and correct for our publishers, but going forward we are only doing this within the Google environment.

Unfortunately, the Feedburner-Google transfer process left many bloggers with ridiculously low subscriber counts for nearly a week. Here at Perishable Press, subscriber counts dropped by more than 50%, fluctuating only slightly for the next several days. Other sites suffered through counts that were significantly lower than expected, with many feeds reporting either zero subscribers or the dreaded N/A error. Even after many people spoke up and blogged about the problem, it was not until shortly after the extremely popular site TechCrunch called Google out that subscriber counts began to return to normal.

Oops, Google Did it Again

Fast-forward to just a few days ago, and we see the whole sordid affair happening all over again. This time, subscriber counts were suddenly and drastically reduced for no apparent reason. People once again began blogging, twittering, and googling, no doubt hoping that this time it the low counts were just a fluke, and that everything would return to normal soon. But it hasn’t. Four days later my subscriber count is still around 40% below normal, and many other sites are experiencing record lows as well. Apparently, people spoke loudly enough to be heard by Google, which finally broke the silence with this brief statement yesterday:

Issue: We are observing reduced subscriber totals reported by Google Feedfetcher for many feeds. This number represents subscribers you may have via Google Reader and iGoogle. These lower totals have occurred over the past two days. We’re working closely with the Feedfetcher team to determine when a resolution might be possible.

Workaround: None. Please bear in mind feeds are available as usual and subscribers (feed and email) are receiving any updates you may be posting. This is a reporting issue only.

Apparently, the statistical under-reporting of Feedburner feeds is due to malfunctioning Feedfetcher software, which is responsible for tracking Google Reader and iGoogle feeds. While frustratingly helpful, this tidbit of information should have been delivered the moment the problem was discovered, not two days after the fact. Even so, it is an interesting side note that the percentage of dropped subscribers correlates to the number of readers using either iGoogle or Google Reader to access our feeds. It would be great to have access to this sort of statistical demographic (aggregator usage, etc.) available to us via our respective Feedburner accounts, but for now I would be happy with just some accurate subscriber numbers.

Of course, the bad news is that there is no known workaround or fix for the issue and that the Google giant is still trying to figure out when a solution “might be possible.” The good news is that Google is finally aware of the issue and will most likely resolve the matter within a relatively short period of time (I’m being optimistic here). Whether or not subscriber counts return to their previous levels after the fix remains to be seen.

It’s About Us, not Google

So where does all of this leave us? As bloggers, subscriber counts are extremely important. They serve as social proof, demonstrating a relative sense of quality, measured in terms of popularity, consistency, and/or relevancy. Many bloggers work extremely hard to deliver quality content to their audience every day. A growing or otherwise consistent number of readers is a key signal to bloggers that their work is paying off. When subscriber counts decrease, strategies are re-evaluated and changes are made. When subscriber counts increase, we are encouraged and continue working diligently along our chosen trajectory.

For better or for worse, subscriber counts have replaced such things as Page Rank to become the new currency of the Blogosphere. A blogger’s subscriber count is:

  • social proof
  • a sign of success
  • a signal of quality
  • an indicator of status
  • a key statistical measure
  • important for advertising
  • correlated with profit
  • used for motivation
  • used as compensation
  • used in competition
  • good for promotion
  • good for business
  • good for pleasure

I mean think about it, why else are subscriber counts displayed so prominently on millions of sites across the Web? Because they are important. Important to writers who spend endless hours producing quality content to their visitors. Important to designers who labor over every detail of their site’s design just to improve visitor experience. Important to bloggers who are passionate about sharing their content with as many readers as possible. To millions of different people, subscriber counts are the most important indicator of growth, status, and success for their site. With millions of users, much trust has been placed into the hands of Google. When their Feedburner service does what it promises, that trust is justified. When Feedburner chokes and Google ignores it, that trust is completely misplaced.

Hopefully Google will realize this soon and take steps to improve the accuracy and consistency of their Feedburner statistics. Seriously Google, when Feedburner breaks, let people know as soon as possible. Explain the issue completely and resolve the issue expediently. Demonstrate transparency and prove to us that we haven’t misplaced our trust in your services. Anything less is unacceptable. Please don’t add Feedburner to the long list of promising companies that were ruined and left for dead after being consumed by yet another over-sized cooperation.

Knowing is Half the Battle

When Feedburner catastrophes strike, we may have no control over the service itself, but there are several things that we can do to prepare, prevent, and remedy the situation. First of all, knowing is half the battle. When you notice that your Feedburner count is drastically different than it ways the day before, it is important to determine if the issue is isolated to your site or if it is a more widespread problem. A quick search for “feedburner subscribers” or “feedburner count” on Twitter and you will know immediately if others are experiencing the same issue. You may also try similar searches on Google, just in case anyone has already managed to crank out a blog post on the issue. Note: if you use Google, you will want to restrict your search by the relevant date range to avoid digging up previous occurrences.

Another useful strategy for avoiding nasty Feedburner subscriber errors is to implement a simple Feedburner fallback mechanism. This will cover your bases when Feedburner takes a nosedive or otherwise delivers erroneous results.

You may also want to begin thinking about how your feed URLs are specified around your site. Instead of using your Feedburner URL, you should provide visitors with the URL of your actual feed. For more about this preventative strategy, check out my article on Why Feedburner Needs a Feed Fix.

And finally, if none of the above strategies provide any sort of relief, there is always the option to drop Feedburner for an alternate feed-tracking and delivery service. Eventually Google is gonna 69 FeedBurner, so might as well get a jump on migrating your feeds sooner than later.

Alternatives to Feedburner

“Are there any alternatives to Feedburner?” I see this question repeatedly every time Feedburner drops the ball. Up until recently, Feedburner was pretty much it for delivering feeds and keeping track of statistics. This is one reason why just about everybody is using Feedburner — the competition has been scarce. Fortunately, some promising Feedburner alternatives are gaining ground:

Unless Google gets a grip on their Feedburner service, these alternatives could really take off. If you have any experience using these services, please share with us in the comments section below.

Jeff Starr
About the Author Jeff Starr = Creative thinker. Passionate about free and open Web.
Archives
9 responses
  1. Jonathan Ellse April 10, 2009 @ 1:19 am

    Same has happened to my blog, which lost 40% of count on Sunday.

  2. Jeff Starr

    Yeh, Google really needs to commit a few more resources to the ‘ol Feedburner department. It’s little grievances like this eventually turned mainstream public opinion against Microsoft. If Google gets so gigantic that they ignore their users, they will suffer the same fate.

  3. Great article – thanks. I’m coming across a few irritating bugs with feedburner – like today the search for subscriber feature is not working – not fun as I have a few thousand subscribers on my cartoon blog!

    On the issue of subscriber counts, just a quick observation that may be helpful by the way – if you change the time your email feed subs get sent out your subs numbers will usually go faulty for about 24 hours (some buggy code related to how feedburner calculates the number of subs – for some strange reason the time the email is sent out is a variable in that equation!)

    Sadly I haven’t come across an equivalent free email feed subs service and it may take a while before the ones you mention in your post catch up :(

  4. Jeff Starr

    @Pratish Mistry: Thanks for the tips for the email subscription delivery service. I am looking forward to the day when there is an alternative to Feedburner that provides the same features, stats, etc. Congrats on the high subscriber count btw!! :)

  5. Thanks for your post. I am a very new Blogger,trying to increase the quality of contents. Yesterday I saw around 35 subscribe but today it came back to 6. I just wonder how it is possible! Don’t know what to do.

  6. Jeff Starr

    Hi Evan, most likely the changes are due to random fluctuations in the number of subscribers that accessed your feed on a particular day. For example, fewer people tend to check their feed readers on the weekends, so subscriber counts are usually lower (for me at least) on Sundays and Mondays. Then, as the week moves on, the count increases. So not to worry, just keep on plugging and keep an eye on the overall trend in subscriber stats.

  7. The number of feedburner subscribers dropped by 1600 in a hard days on my site this week.

  8. Amanda Tempel September 24, 2012 @ 7:02 am

    I personally am really worried that everyone’s Feedburner stats have come up as 0 since the 19th. I want it to go back to normal :(

    • Jeff Starr

      My FB stats returned today.. but while they were down I created my own feed-tracking plugin for WP.. I’ll be releasing it here at Perishable Press once it’s fully tested and ready. Hopefully it will help people better handle their own feed stats.

[ Comments are closed for this post ]